Canadian Human Rights Commission (CHRC)

Canadian Human Rights Commission

Role or Position

Established in 1977, the Canadian Human Rights Commission (CHRC) is an independent government body that oversees the Canadian Human Rights Act and the Employment Equity Act. The CHRC receives and investigates complaints about discriminatory practices under federal jurisdiction, including banks, airlines, telecommunications, inter-provincial travel, First Nations, and in the federal public service.  The Act applies to areas such as employment, goods and services, housing, telecommunications and hate messages, and special measures.

The CHRC received nearly 10,000 calls in 2009, and investigated nearly 700 claims.  It has a dispute resolution program and undertakes extensive public information and research initiatives on a wide range of human rights topics.

What Happened

CHRC funding has been unsustainably low and has deteriorated since 2006 due to lack of federal government support, which was foreshadowed in 1999 after a comment made by Stephen Harper.


CHRC funding has been unsustainably low and has deteriorated since 2006.  In 2001-2002, the CHRC budget was $21,726,000. A decade later, planned spending for 2010-2011 is only marginally higher, at $22,475,000. Adjusting for inflation, this represents a 20% drop. In March 2010, the CHRC announced that it was forced to close its offices in Toronto, Vancouver, and Halifax. Together, these three offices had received 70% of complaints to the CHRC in the year 2008.

At the same time, the CHRC’s legal mandate and areas of activity have grown. In 2008, its jurisdiction was extended, for the first time, to Aboriginal persons living on reserve, with a 3-year delay for complaints against First Nations’ governing authorities. 

A decade after 9/11, the CHRC has also waded into to the sensitive area of national security, publishing a research report that is critical of the lack of accountability of CSIS, the RCMP and other surveillance and control agencies. It also released its Special Report to Parliament that sets out Guidelines to assist federal government agencies to be accountable and transparent to Canadians when implementing national security measures and reporting on human rights in the national security context.

Human rights commissions in Canada have been subject to unprecedented attacks on their mandates, including by elected officials determined to roll back rights by repealing a key protection against virulent hate speech which is currently protected under Section 13 of the Canadian Human Rights Act.  Foreshadowing the current hostility to human rights commissions, Stephen Harper told Terry O’Neill of BC Report newsmagazine in 1999 that “Human rights commissions, as they are evolving, are an attack on our fundamental freedoms and the basic existence of a democratic society. It is in fact totalitarianism. I find this very scary stuff.”

Relevant Dates:

  • 2001: CHRC released its Annual Report, with operating expenses at $21,726,000.
  • June 2008: Bill C-21 gives First Nation Canadians the right - for the first time in Canadian history - to bring discrimination cases before the CHRC under the Indian Act.  However, no new funds were given to the the CHRC on a permanent basis to pay for this significant new responsibility.
  • 2010-11: CHRC's planned expenses are $22,475,000. Adjusting for inflation, this represents a drop of 20% over 10 years.
  • March 2011: CHRC announces plans to close its regional offices in Toronto, Vancouver, and Halifax.
  • September 2011. A private member's bill is introduced by MP Brian Storseth (CPC-Westlock-St. Paul) to repeal Section 13 of the CHRA and eliminate hate speech protections.
  • November 2011. CHRC publishes National Security and Human Rights which examines critically the government's record on human rights in the 'war against terror' and releases its Special Report to Parliament on Human Rights and National Security.   

Implications and Consequences

  • Democracy: The underfunding of the Canadian Human Rights Commission means that it is less able to fulfill its legal mandate.
  • Equality: The cuts and closures will make it increasingly difficult for individuals from marginalized and racialized groups in major centers to file human rights complaints.  It will be more difficult for the CHRC to reach out to stakeholders, organizations and businesses in these regions.
  • Equality: Canadians who want to be treated equally, as is their right in a democracy, will be at pains to have that right respected.
  • Democracy: The undermining of the CHRC could lead to other democratic institutions in Canada being compromised.